Exposure-Response (ER) and Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Analyses for Optimal Step-up Dose (SUD) Selection to Improve Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) Safety Profile of Abbv-383 in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

Introduction

ABBV-383 is a differentiated BCMA x CD3 bispecific antibody (fully humanized IgG4) T-cell engager composed of a bivalent BCMA binding domain with high avidity, a low-affinity CD3-binding domain, and a present but silenced-Fc tail retaining the FcRn binding allowing for an extended half-life and thereby, enabling dosing convenience. ABBV-383 monotherapy has shown promising activity and improved CRS safety profile with modified dexamethasone (Dex) premedication in patients (pts) with RRMM (NCT03933735; Rodriguez et al., JCO 2024;42[suppl 16]:7531). Here, ER and CRS PK/PD analyses supporting the selection of optimal SUD for ABBV-383 are reported.

Methods

ER-efficacy (N=286) and -safety (N=290) analyses were conducted using logistic regression methodology (R version 4.3.2) combining data from escalation (0.025-120 mg Q3W) and expansion (20, 40, 60 mg Q3W and 60 mg Q4W) cohorts of phase 1 study NCT03933735 and Arm A of phase 1b study NCT05650632 evaluating step-up dose (2 or 4 mg on Day 1) with a full dose (60 mg on Day 4) in pts with RRMM. Pts received modified Dex with full dose in expansion cohorts of 60 mg Q4W and 2/60 mg Q4W. In all other cohorts with or without SUD, pts received low Dex. Based on prior knowledge (JCO 2024;42[suppl 16]:7541), the safety endpoints (CRS: any-grade and ≥ G2) were modeled with Cycle 1 total (unbound + bound to soluble BCMA) C_max, while objective response rate (ORR) was modeled with free (unbound + partially bound to soluble BCMA) C_avg. CRS ER models included a priori selected Dex (low vs. modified) and SUD (yes vs. no) as predictors. Relevant pt-specific covariates were tested in all models.

CRS PK/PD analyses included total PK, IL-6, and CRS data (N=199) from the first 3 cycles of the above phase 1/1b studies. A semi-mechanistic indirect response PK/IL-6 model was developed to correlate total PK and IL-6 (NONMEM 7.5). Maximal IL-6 concentrations were derived using post hoc estimates from the PK/IL-6 model and correlated with CRS events (logistic regression; R version 4.3.2). The models included effects of time-dependent Dex (low vs. modified) and SUD (yes vs. no). The overall modeling approach was assessed by comparing observed and predicted CRS rates. Simulations were conducted for various dosing regimens, including one or two SUD and Dex premedication scenarios to support the selection of the optimal SUD.

Results

Consistent with clinical observations (separate abstract submission), any-grade CRS model predicted probabilities suggested two key outcomes: 1) premedication with modified Dex improves the CRS safety profile compared to the low Dex (42% vs 69% for 60 mg Q4W); 2) modified Dex with SUD further improves the CRS safety profile of ABBV-383 compared to low Dex with SUD (29% vs 43% for 2/60 mg Q4W). Consistent with prior work, no ER relationship was observed for ≥ G2 CRS (p > 0.05). The ORR model resulted in a predicted probability of 68% ORR (closely matching with overall observed 64% ORR) with no impact of SUD and modified Dex. Only soluble BCMA was selected as a covariate in the ORR ER model.

The final semi-mechanistic PK/IL-6 model well captured the observed IL-6 data, and the CRS rates (predicted by the logistic regression models) closely matched with the observed data. The CRS PK/PD analyses findings were consistent with the clinical observations and ER analyses key outcomes 1 and 2. The CRS PK/PD analyses predictions comparing the 1-SUD vs 2-SUD (untested) regimens with modified Dex suggested that 1) among the 2-SUD regimens with modified Dex, the 2/3/60 mg regimen would have the maximum reduction of 4% points in any-grade CRS compared to the 2/60 mg 1-SUD regimen, however, with substantial overlap of confidence intervals and with no decrease in ≥ G2 CRS (< 0.5% point); 2) 4 mg as an intermediate SUD in a 2-SUD regimen would lead to higher any-grade and ≥ G2 CRS rates (~9% and 3% points higher, respectively), compared to the 2/60 mg Q4W regimen.

Conclusions

ER and CRS PK/PD analyses suggested that modified Dex and SUD improve the CRS safety profile of ABBV-383 with no impact on efficacy (ORR) in pts with RRMM. The CRS PK/PD predictions indicated that implementation of 2-SUDs provide minimal additional or no improvement in CRS safety profile compared to 1-SUD. Overall, the 1-SUD dosing regimen of 2 mg with modified premedication prior to the full dose of 60 mg Q4W showed promising results and can be considered for future evaluation and studies.

Wang:AbbVie Inc: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Babel:AbbVie Inc: Current Employment. Schmitt:AbbVie Inc: Current Employment. Uddin:AbbVie Inc: Current Employment. Baljevic:Janssen Biotech, BMS/Celgene, Sanofi-Genzyme: Other: advisory board; Parexel: Other: IRC; AbbVie, Pfizer: Consultancy. Voorhees:Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Lava Therapeutics: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Regeneron: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Rodriguez:Takeda: Consultancy; Johnson and Johnson: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy. Kumar:Merck: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Other: Independent review committee participation; Roche: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; KITE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; MedImmune/AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Mian:Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria. Svensson:AbbVie Inc.: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Talati:AbbVie Inc: Current Employment. Mensing:AbbVie Inc: Current Employment. Menon:AbbVie Inc: Current Employment. Engelhardt:AbbVie Inc: Current Employment. Polepally:AbbVie Inc.: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company.